With the win, Fee brought his lifetime tournament earnings to $3,035,453.
It have been 34 years since a team event was played on the WSOP, however the variation proved very popular, as 863 teams which includes two to four players each registered to play. The principles were that every member of the team needed to sit in for no less than one round of blinds. The format gave Polk, who plays much more tournaments than Fee, the risk to play. Polk ended up multi-tabling on the Rio.
The bracelet was Polk’s second and Fee’s first. Card Player caught up with Fee, who coaches at upswingpoker.com, to speak about the tournament win and the way the money games has been lately.
Brian Pempus: Are you able to speak about your bracelet this summer with Doug Polk?
Ryan Fee: Being in Vegas for the summer is actually rad. I USED TO BEn’t there to play in WSOP tournaments. I was there to play just a little live cash and hang around with everybody and perform a little Upswing stuff. I hadn’t played any tournaments until the tag team. It was funny, we were fascinated with doing a promotion for Upswing where you must play with Doug and I, but if we read the rules, it's worthwhile to play one orbit and that i could play the remainder of the tournament. We were also strapped for time, so we didn’t finally end up doing that. Doug and that i registered late, and we came in with about 17 big blinds. We hopped in and went from side to side playing just a little. I said I had a “pretty good feeling about this one.” In the event you grind the WSOP for awhile, you get tired, but I USED TO BE super fresh. I hadn’t had played a live tournament all year. I USED TO BE within the zone…I ended up grinding it as much as as much as 120,000 or 130,000, after which Doug tagged in. There has been not up to 50 left at this point, and Doug rode out the night shift. Doug ran an all-in bluff within five minutes of him showing up. The board was A-2-3-4-5 and it was really hard for the fellow to have a six, nevertheless it wasn’t impossible. I saw Doug go all-in and that i was like, “I really don’t think Doug has it” (laughs). I USED TO BE thinking, “man, I’ve played this tournament for hours and if Doug busts in five minutes…” (laughs). Luckily, Doug got the man off of it, and we had 25 or 30 percent of the chips going into the overall table…The final table was day 1 of 1 Drop, and Doug was playing that, but he had an hour before it started so he hopped in and played. I tagged in with six or seven people left and played it right down to heads-up. I tagged out for 3 hands while he was on a break within the One Drop. He somehow doubled in precisely three hands. [Later winning] was super crazy and surreal.
BP: As a cash game specialist, does it feel strange to have a bracelet now?
RF: For the selection of tournaments I’ve played, I'VE some of the blessed tournament careers ever. I dropped out of faculty after I was 18, and that i was playing $2-$4 cash games on the time. By the top of the year I USED TO BE playing $10-$20. Then I played my first ever live tournament and won it for like $280,000. I played an entire year of tournaments in 2014: LAPC, Bay 101, WSOP, Barcelona, Macau, Aussie Millions. I did pretty well, but I didn’t like traveling that much. I REALLY LIKE cash games far more. After that year, I DETERMINED that I had had enough. I BELIEVE there has been a few one-percent chance of me [ever] having a bracelet. I only played one event this summer and that was because Doug was like, “Come on man, let’s do it.”
BP: What do you prefer more about cash games as a poker pro?
RF: Something that sticks out for me in tournaments is that you're mostly going to lose. It's tough to lose over 90 percent of your days [in tournaments]. I FEEL you may make extra money in cash games. You'll have a larger edge. You'll be able to reload in case you bust in a cash game. I BELIEVE in a live setting the vibe in a cash game could also be more talkative and fun than in tournaments. Your destiny is more to your hands in cash games. I tell people who being just a cash game player is fine, but I don’t think anyone should only play tournaments as a result of how much variance there is.
BP: Are you able to discuss the way you built your bankroll and the way you climbed the ladder?
RF: I BEGAN playing poker in school, depositing $300 and playing $0.10-$0.25 full ring. I turned $300 into like $17,000 by the top of that year. On the time I USED TO BE super obsessed and absorbed by poker. I didn’t wish to do school, so I left and commenced playing full-time. I loved it. Probably the most most rewarding years playing poker were probably the primary two years. It was an excellent outlet for me, and in numerous ways helped me grow and become the individual I'M today. I converted to six-max cash games within the second year. I won that gigantic tournament, and in 2009 I moved out to California. I USED TO BE playing heads-up and six-max. I USED TO BE playing anywhere from $5-$10 to $25-$50. In 2010, I USED TO BE playing as much as $50-$100 online. Black Friday happened and that i traveled around. I BELIEVE the bottom stake I played from 2011 to now was $10-$20. I played a large number of heads-up, but roughly got sick of that and did the tournament thing for a year. But now I'VE a superior balance between live and online cash games.
BP: What are the live cash games like in Las Vegas these days?
RF: Poker is alive and well in America. Online isn’t what it once was, but all those individuals who played didn’t stop playing. They started playing live. With more casinos being built across the country, I'D say poker is pretty vibrant. In Las Vegas, it kind of feels love it is growing. Also in La. I play in some private games in LA and Las Vegas, and people games are going strong as well.
RF: Americans aren’t good at poker now relative to the remainder of the world, and it’s because they don’t have access to plenty of online poker. In case you are going to get good at poker you must play online, for those who take a look at it as a learning tool. You'll play more tables and there's a higher caliber of player. You'll play 1/10th the stakes online that you're playing and the games could be tougher. Will probably be great so that you can learn and become a greater player. Whilst you play online, you might be forced to check your play and be very analytical about things. People often take into consideration very qualitative things and never very quantitative things. As opposed to serious about the way you wish to approach preflop, what hands would qualify as a chance or check, or check-raise, [the thinking] is like: “I think he's continuation betting here so much so I'LL raise,” “he has it here so much so I WILL fold,” or “he bluffs so much here so I WILL call.” There’s not a large number of structure to it by linking these types of qualitative things together to form a game plan. Whereas how Doug and that i approach it's super structured. There's a framework.
One of the things Doug and that i did once we first started playing live tournaments was calling numerous hands out of the large blind, because we were getting great pot odds. That is something tournament players weren’t doing. We might occasionally make fun of them, but I remember numerous tournament players would make fun people for [this strategy]. A year or two later, I see those self same guys defending J-2 off suit and I’m like, “wow, shoe is at the other foot now.”…People often do what’s en vogue, and so they don’t really understand why they're doing it. I'M never taken with me not having an edge in poker, because I WILL BE ABLE TO learn and figure things out. LOTS OF PEOPLE have more of a static strategy.
BP: In the event you needed to say at what point in a poker hand are people on the low-to-mid stakes generally the weakest at, what would your answer be?
RF: Preflop is unequivocally an important street as it happens ONE HUNDRED PC of hands, whereas the river happens a small percentage of the time. After all at the river the pot is far bigger, but it’s going to be really hard so that you can be that bad at the river and that good preflop, to make you should take care of the river. The question kind of suggests you'll be able to work on a single street…but it's all within the greater context of what your strategy is that if. you watch the Super High Roller Cash Game from last year, there have been three tables, certainly one of them had [Phil] Ivey, [Antonio] Esfandiari, [Doyle] Brunson, and a pair other live pro people. Another one had Bill Perkins, Rick Salomon. The last one was like Doug, Scott Seiver, Dan Colman, [David] Sands. If you happen to watch the television pros you’ll notice it is extremely passive preflop. There wasn’t so much re-raising or open raising. There has been numerous limping. But when you watch the only with Doug and all of the young punk kids, you’ll see among the hands are raise, re-raise, call, or re-raise, fold, or something like that. The sport was much more aggressive preflop, and that i think that’s the right way to be. I'D say understanding the best way to play preflop is essentially the most valuable and significant thing, and in addition by far the toughest to do. People will inquire from me online to provide them the GTO button range, and I’m like, “if I had the GTO button range I MIGHT have solved poker as it would imply that I’ve solved the flop, turn and river with the intention to determine what the most efficient hands to play preflop are.” You can’t determine a really perfect solution [preflop], so that you need to do a good little bit of guess work and experimentation to have a handle on it.
Read More... [Source: CardPlayer Poker News]
No comments:
Post a Comment